Find That Nursing Home

Richfield Health Center - Salem

3719 Knollridge Road, Salem, VA 24153Map

(540) 380-4500

Medicare/Medicaid certified112 certified beds~102 residents/dayNon profit - Corporation

Last standard health inspection: May 15, 2024 (more than 2 years ago — ratings may not reflect current conditions)

This home's last health inspection was more than 2 years ago — ratings may not reflect current conditions. more

Inspections are supposed to happen roughly yearly, but surveyor shortages have left some homes uninspected for much longer. CMS flags facilities whose most recent standard health inspection is more than two years old. For these homes, the health-inspection star is based on old information — things may have improved or declined since.

What to do with this: weigh recent staffing data more heavily than the inspection star, and ask the facility when their last survey was and when they expect the next.

Richfield Health Center - Salem is a 112-bed nonprofit, corporation-run nursing home in Salem, Salem City County, Virginia, serving an average of 102 residents per day. As of CMS data processed June 1, 2026, its overall rating is 3 of 5 stars.

CMS star ratings

CMS scores every nursing home 1–5 stars overall, built from three sub-ratings. more

Medicare inspects and measures every certified nursing home, then rolls the results into a 1–5 star overall rating. It combines three parts: health inspections, staffing, and quality measures. Five stars means much better than average — it does not mean perfect. One star means much worse than average — it does not mean every shift is bad. Stars are a screening tool, not a verdict. They can lag reality by months, and they can't see things like how kind the aides are or how the building smells at 7am.

What to do with this: use stars to build a shortlist, then visit in person. Nothing on this site replaces walking the halls.

Overall
VA median: 3★
Health inspectionsmost objective — on-site surveyors
VA median: 3★
Staffingpayroll-audited
VA median: 2★
Quality measurespartly self-reported by the facility
VA median: 4★
Health-inspection stars are graded on a curve within each state — never compare stars across state lines. more

CMS sets health-inspection star cutoffs separately for each state: roughly the top 10% of homes in a state get 5 stars, the bottom 20% get 1 star, no matter how the state compares to others. That means a 4-star home in one state and a 4-star home in another state may have very different inspection records. The stars tell you how a home compares to its neighbors, not to the whole country. That's why this site shows your state's median next to each star rating — and never a national star comparison.

What to do with this: compare stars only between homes in the same state. To compare across states, use staffing hours — those are real numbers, not curves.

Not all three sub-ratings are equally hard to game: inspections are the most objective, quality measures the least. more

The three sub-ratings come from different sources. Health inspections are done on-site by trained state surveyors who show up mostly unannounced — the most objective signal. Staffing comes from payroll records that facilities must submit and CMS audits — quite reliable. Quality measures are partly self-reported by the facility from its own resident assessments — useful, but the facility grades some of its own homework.

What to do with this: when sub-ratings disagree, weigh the inspection star most and the quality-measure star least.

Staffing

Reported hours per resident per day, from payroll records. Hours, unlike stars, can be compared across states.

Hours per resident per day: total staff hours worked, divided by the number of residents. more

If a home reports 3.5 total nursing hours per resident per day, that's all nursing staff time across 24 hours — roughly one caregiver-hour every 7 hours per resident, spread across day, evening, and night shifts. On a real floor it decides whether call lights get answered in 5 minutes or 25, whether someone has time to help with dinner, and whether night shift is one aide for a hall or two. Unlike star ratings, hours are actual numbers, so they CAN be compared across state lines.

What to do with this: compare a home's hours to the state and national medians shown, and ask the facility how the hours split across day, evening, and night shifts.

RN (registered nurse) hours

This facility0.63
VA median0.51
US median0.58

LPN (licensed practical nurse) hours

This facility1.19
VA median0.98
US median0.85

Nurse aide hours

This facility2.42
VA median1.99
US median2.23

Total nursing hours

This facility4.25
VA median3.45
US median3.69

CMS also adjusts these numbers for how sick each home’s residents are — a home with sicker residents needs more staff for the same star. This home’s case-mix-adjusted total: 4.35 (US median, adjusted: 3.78).

CMS also adjusts staffing numbers for how sick each home's residents are. more

A home full of short-term rehab patients needs different staffing than a home caring for people with advanced dementia or ventilators. Case-mix adjustment estimates how many hours a home's particular residents need, then scales the reported hours so homes can be compared fairly. A home with sicker residents needs more staff for the same star. This page shows reported (raw payroll) numbers and compares them only to other reported numbers — like with like.

What to do with this: if a home's reported hours look low, check whether its residents may simply need less care — and ask the facility directly.

Staff turnover

Total nursing staff turnover: 49.6% · VA median: 47.8% · RN turnover: 56.3% (VA median: 47.6%)

The share of nursing staff who left within the year. Lower is steadier. more

Total nursing staff turnover is the percentage of the home's nurses and aides who stopped working there during the year. Around half of nursing-home staff leaving annually is sadly common in this industry. High turnover means residents are cared for by people who don't know them — which matters enormously for dementia care, pain management, and noticing the small changes that catch problems early. Low turnover usually means staff are treated well enough to stay.

What to do with this: when you visit, ask aides how long they've worked there. Long-tenured aides are the best sign a building has.

Inspections & deficiencies

The last 3 inspection cycles, from CMS’s federal health-survey file. State-only citations and fire-safety surveys are not included — an empty list means nothing federal is in this file, not that nothing ever happened.

Each deficiency gets a letter A–L: how severe it was × how widespread it was. more

Surveyors grade every deficiency on a grid. Severity runs from 'potential for minimal harm' up to 'immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.' Scope runs from isolated (one or a few residents) to pattern to widespread. A and B are paperwork-level; D–F caused no actual harm but had the potential; G–I caused actual harm; J, K, and L mean immediate jeopardy — the most serious finding a surveyor can make. Most citations nationally are D–E.

What to do with this: scan for G or higher. One J/K/L tells you more than ten D's.

Standard surveys are routine; complaint surveys happen because someone reported a problem. more

A standard survey is the routine top-to-bottom inspection every home gets on a recurring cycle. A complaint survey happens because a resident, family member, or staff member reported something to the state — surveyors come specifically to investigate it. Infection-control surveys focus on practices like hand hygiene and isolation procedures. A deficiency found during a complaint survey means someone cared enough to report it and a surveyor confirmed enough to cite it.

What to do with this: note which deficiencies came from complaints — they show you what residents and families actually experienced.

The F-number on each deficiency is CMS's code for which federal requirement was violated. more

Every federal nursing-home requirement has a tag number. F0686, for example, is the pressure-ulcer requirement; F0600 is freedom from abuse. The tag tells you exactly which rule was broken, and the description next to it is CMS's own plain-language summary of that rule. The same tag appearing across multiple inspections is a pattern worth noticing.

What to do with this: if the same tag repeats across surveys, ask the facility what changed since the last citation.

This data shows federal health surveys only — state-only citations and fire-safety surveys aren't included. more

CMS's public deficiency file contains federal health-survey citations. It does not include citations issued under state-only rules, fire-safety (Life Safety Code) surveys, or anything older than three inspection cycles. A facility with no rows here may still have state citations or fire-safety findings. 'No deficiencies in this file' never means 'no violations ever.'

What to do with this: for the full picture, check your state health department's site and medicare.gov/care-compare, which shows fire-safety results separately.

31 deficiencies across the last 3 inspection cycles, in CMS’s federal health-survey file:

  • Resident Assessment and Care Planning: 7
  • Quality of Life and Care: 6
  • Resident Rights: 6
  • Pharmacy Service: 3
  • Administration: 3
  • Infection Control: 2
  • Nutrition and Dietary: 2
  • Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation: 1
  • Environmental: 1
  • December 5, 2024Complaint surveyTag F0658Dno actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

    Deficient, Provider has date of correction · corrected January 8, 2025

  • December 5, 2024Complaint surveyTag F0760Gactual harm, isolated

    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.

    Deficient, Provider has date of correction · corrected January 8, 2025

  • December 5, 2024Complaint surveyTag F0770Dno actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.

    Deficient, Provider has date of correction · corrected January 8, 2025

  • December 5, 2024Complaint surveyTag F0825Dno actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.

    Deficient, Provider has date of correction · corrected January 8, 2025

  • May 15, 2024Standard surveyTag F0550Dno actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

    Deficient, Provider has date of correction · corrected July 15, 2024

  • May 15, 2024Standard surveyTag F0580Dno actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

    Deficient, Provider has date of correction · corrected July 15, 2024

  • May 15, 2024Standard surveyTag F0582Dno actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.

    Deficient, Provider has date of correction · corrected July 15, 2024

  • May 15, 2024Standard surveyTag F0641Dno actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.

    Deficient, Provider has date of correction · corrected July 15, 2024

  • May 15, 2024Standard surveyTag F0656Dno actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

    Deficient, Provider has date of correction · corrected July 15, 2024

  • May 15, 2024Standard surveyTag F0657Dno actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

    Deficient, Provider has date of correction · corrected July 15, 2024

Show 21 more deficiencies
  • May 15, 2024Standard surveyTag F0684Dno actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

    Deficient, Provider has date of correction · corrected July 15, 2024

  • May 15, 2024Standard surveyTag F0756Dno actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.

    Deficient, Provider has date of correction · corrected July 15, 2024

  • May 15, 2024Standard surveyTag F0842Dno actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.

    Deficient, Provider has date of correction · corrected July 15, 2024

  • May 15, 2024Standard surveyTag F0883Dno actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.

    Deficient, Provider has date of correction · corrected July 15, 2024

  • February 8, 2023Standard surveyTag F0584Dno actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

    Deficient, Provider has date of correction · corrected March 23, 2023

  • February 8, 2023Standard surveyTag F0607Eno actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern

    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.

    Deficient, Provider has date of correction · corrected March 23, 2023

  • February 8, 2023Standard surveyTag F0657Dno actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

    Deficient, Provider has date of correction · corrected March 23, 2023

  • February 8, 2023Standard surveyTag F0677Eno actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern

    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.

    Deficient, Provider has date of correction · corrected March 23, 2023

  • February 8, 2023Standard surveyTag F0757Dno actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.

    Deficient, Provider has date of correction · corrected March 23, 2023

  • February 8, 2023Standard surveyTag F0770Dno actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.

    Deficient, Provider has date of correction · corrected March 23, 2023

  • February 8, 2023Standard surveyTag F0880Dno actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

    Deficient, Provider has date of correction · corrected March 23, 2023

  • July 29, 2021Standard surveyTag F0578Dno actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.

    Deficient, Provider has date of correction · corrected September 10, 2021

  • July 29, 2021Standard surveyTag F0584Dno actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

    Deficient, Provider has date of correction · corrected September 10, 2021

  • July 29, 2021Standard surveyTag F0656Dno actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

    Deficient, Provider has date of correction · corrected September 10, 2021

  • July 29, 2021Standard surveyTag F0684Dno actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

    Deficient, Provider has date of correction · corrected September 10, 2021

  • July 29, 2021Standard surveyTag F0689Dno actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

    Deficient, Provider has date of correction · corrected September 10, 2021

  • July 29, 2021Standard surveyTag F0690Dno actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.

    Deficient, Provider has date of correction · corrected September 10, 2021

  • July 29, 2021Standard surveyTag F0772Dno actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    Have an agreement with an approved laboratory to obtain services, if on-site laboratory services aren't provided.

    Deficient, Provider has date of correction · corrected September 10, 2021

  • July 29, 2021Standard surveyTag F0803Dno actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.

    Deficient, Provider has date of correction · corrected September 10, 2021

  • July 29, 2021Standard surveyTag F0812Eno actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

    Deficient, Provider has date of correction · corrected September 10, 2021

  • July 29, 2021Standard surveyTag F0908Dno actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    Keep all essential equipment working safely.

    Deficient, Provider has date of correction · corrected September 10, 2021

Fines & penalties

CMS can fine a home or stop paying for new admissions. Shown per CMS's current data window (~3 years) — not all-time. more

When deficiencies are serious or aren't fixed, CMS can impose a fine (a civil money penalty) or a payment denial — refusing to pay for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions until the home fixes the problem. Payment denials hit harder than most fines because they stop revenue. CMS's public dataset covers a rolling window of roughly the last three years, so the totals here are recent history, not an all-time record. Many facilities have no penalties in the window — that's common, not remarkable.

What to do with this: a recent large fine deserves a direct question on your visit — what happened, and what changed?

Fines: 1 totaling $15,465 — per CMS data (rolling ~3-year window).

DateTypeAmount / length
December 5, 2024Fine$15,465

Ownership & chain

Who actually owns and controls the facility — individuals, companies, and their stakes. more

Nursing homes are often owned through layers: an operating company, a property company, management companies, and individual investors with percentage stakes. CMS publishes who holds 5%-or-greater interests and who has operational control. Ownership matters because it sets the budget: research has linked some ownership structures, especially certain chains and investment vehicles, to lower staffing. That's a pattern across the industry, not a verdict on any one building.

What to do with this: know who owns the home before you sign anything, and ask the administrator who actually sets the staffing budget.

CMS lists no chain affiliation for this facility.

Owner / managerRoleStakeSince
Friendship Foundation Inc (Organization)5% or greater direct ownership interest100%10/01/2023
Brown, Edwards & Company, LLP (Organization)Adp of the snfNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
Campbell, Luke (Individual)Adp of the snfNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
Duncan, Stephanie (Individual)Adp of the snfNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
Friendship Foundation Inc (Organization)Adp of the snfNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
Higgins, Benjamin (Individual)Adp of the snfNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
Hoff, Joseph (Individual)Adp of the snfNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
Layell, Erin (Individual)Adp of the snfNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
Lowe, Todd (Individual)Adp of the snfNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
Rodger, Mary (Individual)Adp of the snfNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
Shannon, Charles (Individual)Adp of the snfNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
Valley Management Co Inc (Organization)Adp of the snfNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
Walker & Associates Pc (Organization)Adp of the snfNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
Bishop, Nathaniel (Individual)Corporate directorNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
Combs, Glen (Individual)Corporate directorNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
Feinour, Edwin (Individual)Corporate directorNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
Grove, Lucian (Individual)Corporate directorNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
Johnson, Cynda (Individual)Corporate directorNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
Lawson, Robert (Individual)Corporate directorNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
Oelschlager, Kathryn (Individual)Corporate directorNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
Sandel, Robert (Individual)Corporate directorNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
Williamson, John (Individual)Corporate directorNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
Hoff, Joseph (Individual)Corporate officerNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
Shannon, Charles (Individual)Corporate officerNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
Bishop, Nathaniel (Individual)Managing control - governing bodyNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
Feldmann, Greg (Individual)Managing control - governing bodyNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
Hoff, Joseph (Individual)Managing control - governing bodyNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
Johnson, Cynda (Individual)Managing control - governing bodyNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
Lawson, Robert (Individual)Managing control - governing bodyNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
Mitchell, Cynthia (Individual)Managing control - governing bodyNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
Nester, Paul (Individual)Managing control - governing bodyNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
Sandel, Robert (Individual)Managing control - governing bodyNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
Shannon, Charles (Individual)Managing control - governing bodyNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
Bishop, Nathaniel (Individual)Operational/managerial controlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
Campbell, Luke (Individual)Operational/managerial controlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
Combs, Glen (Individual)Operational/managerial controlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
Duncan, Stephanie (Individual)Operational/managerial controlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
Feinour, Edwin (Individual)Operational/managerial controlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
Feldmann, Greg (Individual)Operational/managerial controlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
Friendship Foundation Inc (Organization)Operational/managerial controlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
Grove, Lucian (Individual)Operational/managerial controlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
Higgins, Benjamin (Individual)Operational/managerial controlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
Hoff, Joseph (Individual)Operational/managerial controlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
Hughes, Angela (Individual)Operational/managerial controlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2002
Johnson, Cynda (Individual)Operational/managerial controlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
Lawson, Robert (Individual)Operational/managerial controlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
Layell, Erin (Individual)Operational/managerial controlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Lowe, Todd (Individual)Operational/managerial controlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
Nester, Paul (Individual)Operational/managerial controlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2024
Nichols, Whitney (Individual)Operational/managerial controlNOT APPLICABLE03/04/2023
Oelschlager, Kathryn (Individual)Operational/managerial controlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
Rodger, Mary (Individual)Operational/managerial controlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
Sandel, Robert (Individual)Operational/managerial controlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
Shannon, Charles (Individual)Operational/managerial controlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
Valley Management Co Inc (Organization)Operational/managerial controlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023

Nearby facilities in Salem City County

Most families compare 2–3 homes. Same county, sorted by overall rating:

Snyder Nursing Home★★★★★Salem
Salem Health & Rehabilitation★★★★★Salem

All nursing homes in Salem City County

Visiting? Go in with questions.

Built from this facility’s own CMS data — bring them on the tour.

  • Their total nursing staff turnover (49.6%) is above the VA median (47.8%) — ask how long the aides on your person's unit have worked there.
  • CMS data shows 1 fine totaling $15,465 in its current data window — ask what the citations were for and what changed afterward.
  • Their weekend total nurse staffing (3.63/resident/day) is lower than their overall figure (4.25) — ask who covers weekends and how shifts are filled when someone calls out.
  • CMS flags that the most recent health inspection here was more than 2 years ago — ask when they expect the next survey and what has changed since the last one.
  • Their last standard health inspection was May 15, 2024 — ask what's improved since then.
  • CMS records that this facility has a resident council — ask to speak with a council member before deciding.
  • They have 112 certified beds and serve an average of 102 residents per day — ask which unit your person would be on and who staffs it overnight.

Data: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (data.cms.gov), processing date June 1, 2026. This site is not affiliated with CMS or any government agency.