Find That Nursing Home

Baptist Village of Owasso

12600 East 73Rd Street North, Owasso, OK 74055Map

(918) 272-8007

Medicare/Medicaid certified120 certified beds~75 residents/dayNon profit - Corporation

Last standard health inspection: June 27, 2025

Baptist Village of Owasso is a 120-bed nonprofit, corporation-run nursing home in Owasso, Tulsa County, Oklahoma, serving an average of 75 residents per day. As of CMS data processed June 1, 2026, its overall rating is 3 of 5 stars.

CMS star ratings

CMS scores every nursing home 1–5 stars overall, built from three sub-ratings. more

Medicare inspects and measures every certified nursing home, then rolls the results into a 1–5 star overall rating. It combines three parts: health inspections, staffing, and quality measures. Five stars means much better than average — it does not mean perfect. One star means much worse than average — it does not mean every shift is bad. Stars are a screening tool, not a verdict. They can lag reality by months, and they can't see things like how kind the aides are or how the building smells at 7am.

What to do with this: use stars to build a shortlist, then visit in person. Nothing on this site replaces walking the halls.

Overall
OK median: 3★
Health inspectionsmost objective — on-site surveyors
OK median: 3★
Staffingpayroll-audited
OK median: 3★
Quality measurespartly self-reported by the facility
OK median: 3★
Health-inspection stars are graded on a curve within each state — never compare stars across state lines. more

CMS sets health-inspection star cutoffs separately for each state: roughly the top 10% of homes in a state get 5 stars, the bottom 20% get 1 star, no matter how the state compares to others. That means a 4-star home in one state and a 4-star home in another state may have very different inspection records. The stars tell you how a home compares to its neighbors, not to the whole country. That's why this site shows your state's median next to each star rating — and never a national star comparison.

What to do with this: compare stars only between homes in the same state. To compare across states, use staffing hours — those are real numbers, not curves.

Not all three sub-ratings are equally hard to game: inspections are the most objective, quality measures the least. more

The three sub-ratings come from different sources. Health inspections are done on-site by trained state surveyors who show up mostly unannounced — the most objective signal. Staffing comes from payroll records that facilities must submit and CMS audits — quite reliable. Quality measures are partly self-reported by the facility from its own resident assessments — useful, but the facility grades some of its own homework.

What to do with this: when sub-ratings disagree, weigh the inspection star most and the quality-measure star least.

Staffing

Reported hours per resident per day, from payroll records. Hours, unlike stars, can be compared across states.

Hours per resident per day: total staff hours worked, divided by the number of residents. more

If a home reports 3.5 total nursing hours per resident per day, that's all nursing staff time across 24 hours — roughly one caregiver-hour every 7 hours per resident, spread across day, evening, and night shifts. On a real floor it decides whether call lights get answered in 5 minutes or 25, whether someone has time to help with dinner, and whether night shift is one aide for a hall or two. Unlike star ratings, hours are actual numbers, so they CAN be compared across state lines.

What to do with this: compare a home's hours to the state and national medians shown, and ask the facility how the hours split across day, evening, and night shifts.

RN (registered nurse) hours

This facility0.16
OK median0.32
US median0.58

LPN (licensed practical nurse) hours

This facility0.87
OK median0.92
US median0.85

Nurse aide hours

This facility2.91
OK median2.45
US median2.23

Total nursing hours

This facility3.95
OK median3.69
US median3.69

CMS also adjusts these numbers for how sick each home’s residents are — a home with sicker residents needs more staff for the same star. This home’s case-mix-adjusted total: 4.34 (US median, adjusted: 3.78).

CMS also adjusts staffing numbers for how sick each home's residents are. more

A home full of short-term rehab patients needs different staffing than a home caring for people with advanced dementia or ventilators. Case-mix adjustment estimates how many hours a home's particular residents need, then scales the reported hours so homes can be compared fairly. A home with sicker residents needs more staff for the same star. This page shows reported (raw payroll) numbers and compares them only to other reported numbers — like with like.

What to do with this: if a home's reported hours look low, check whether its residents may simply need less care — and ask the facility directly.

Staff turnover

Total nursing staff turnover: 70.5% · OK median: 56.8% · RN turnover: 80% (OK median: 57.1%)

The share of nursing staff who left within the year. Lower is steadier. more

Total nursing staff turnover is the percentage of the home's nurses and aides who stopped working there during the year. Around half of nursing-home staff leaving annually is sadly common in this industry. High turnover means residents are cared for by people who don't know them — which matters enormously for dementia care, pain management, and noticing the small changes that catch problems early. Low turnover usually means staff are treated well enough to stay.

What to do with this: when you visit, ask aides how long they've worked there. Long-tenured aides are the best sign a building has.

Inspections & deficiencies

The last 3 inspection cycles, from CMS’s federal health-survey file. State-only citations and fire-safety surveys are not included — an empty list means nothing federal is in this file, not that nothing ever happened.

Each deficiency gets a letter A–L: how severe it was × how widespread it was. more

Surveyors grade every deficiency on a grid. Severity runs from 'potential for minimal harm' up to 'immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.' Scope runs from isolated (one or a few residents) to pattern to widespread. A and B are paperwork-level; D–F caused no actual harm but had the potential; G–I caused actual harm; J, K, and L mean immediate jeopardy — the most serious finding a surveyor can make. Most citations nationally are D–E.

What to do with this: scan for G or higher. One J/K/L tells you more than ten D's.

Standard surveys are routine; complaint surveys happen because someone reported a problem. more

A standard survey is the routine top-to-bottom inspection every home gets on a recurring cycle. A complaint survey happens because a resident, family member, or staff member reported something to the state — surveyors come specifically to investigate it. Infection-control surveys focus on practices like hand hygiene and isolation procedures. A deficiency found during a complaint survey means someone cared enough to report it and a surveyor confirmed enough to cite it.

What to do with this: note which deficiencies came from complaints — they show you what residents and families actually experienced.

The F-number on each deficiency is CMS's code for which federal requirement was violated. more

Every federal nursing-home requirement has a tag number. F0686, for example, is the pressure-ulcer requirement; F0600 is freedom from abuse. The tag tells you exactly which rule was broken, and the description next to it is CMS's own plain-language summary of that rule. The same tag appearing across multiple inspections is a pattern worth noticing.

What to do with this: if the same tag repeats across surveys, ask the facility what changed since the last citation.

This data shows federal health surveys only — state-only citations and fire-safety surveys aren't included. more

CMS's public deficiency file contains federal health-survey citations. It does not include citations issued under state-only rules, fire-safety (Life Safety Code) surveys, or anything older than three inspection cycles. A facility with no rows here may still have state citations or fire-safety findings. 'No deficiencies in this file' never means 'no violations ever.'

What to do with this: for the full picture, check your state health department's site and medicare.gov/care-compare, which shows fire-safety results separately.

14 deficiencies across the last 3 inspection cycles, in CMS’s federal health-survey file:

  • Resident Assessment and Care Planning: 6
  • Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation: 2
  • Quality of Life and Care: 2
  • Resident Rights: 1
  • Infection Control: 1
  • Pharmacy Service: 1
  • Environmental: 1
  • June 27, 2025Standard surveyTag F0582Eno actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern

    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.

    Deficient, Provider has date of correction · corrected July 21, 2025

  • June 27, 2025Standard surveyTag F0605Dno actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.

    Deficient, Provider has date of correction · corrected July 21, 2025

  • June 27, 2025Standard surveyTag F0641Dno actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.

    Deficient, Provider has date of correction · corrected July 21, 2025

  • June 27, 2025Standard surveyTag F0657Dno actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

    Deficient, Provider has date of correction · corrected July 21, 2025

  • June 27, 2025Standard + Complaint surveyTag F0689Gactual harm, isolated

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

    Deficient, Provider has date of correction · corrected July 21, 2025

  • June 27, 2025Standard surveyTag F0880Dno actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

    Deficient, Provider has date of correction · corrected July 21, 2025

  • March 11, 2025Complaint surveyTag F0600Jimmediate jeopardy to resident health or safety, isolated

    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

    Deficient, Provider has date of correction · corrected March 28, 2025

  • July 24, 2024Standard surveyTag F0640Dno actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.

    Deficient, Provider has date of correction · corrected September 6, 2024

  • July 24, 2024Standard surveyTag F0642Dno actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    Ensure a qualified health professional conducts resident assessments.

    Deficient, Provider has date of correction · corrected September 6, 2024

  • July 24, 2024Standard surveyTag F0758Eno actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern

    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.

    Deficient, Provider has date of correction · corrected September 6, 2024

Show 4 more deficiencies
  • June 29, 2023Standard surveyTag F0641Eno actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern

    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.

    Deficient, Provider has date of correction · corrected August 18, 2023

  • June 29, 2023Standard surveyTag F0656Eno actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

    Deficient, Provider has date of correction · corrected August 18, 2023

  • June 29, 2023Standard surveyTag F0700Eno actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern

    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.

    Deficient, Provider has date of correction · corrected August 18, 2023

  • June 29, 2023Standard surveyTag F0909Eno actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern

    Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.

    Deficient, Provider has date of correction · corrected August 18, 2023

Fines & penalties

CMS can fine a home or stop paying for new admissions. Shown per CMS's current data window (~3 years) — not all-time. more

When deficiencies are serious or aren't fixed, CMS can impose a fine (a civil money penalty) or a payment denial — refusing to pay for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions until the home fixes the problem. Payment denials hit harder than most fines because they stop revenue. CMS's public dataset covers a rolling window of roughly the last three years, so the totals here are recent history, not an all-time record. Many facilities have no penalties in the window — that's common, not remarkable.

What to do with this: a recent large fine deserves a direct question on your visit — what happened, and what changed?

Fines: 2 totaling $18,155 — per CMS data (rolling ~3-year window).

DateTypeAmount / length
June 27, 2025Fine$9,110
March 11, 2025Fine$9,045

Ownership & chain

Who actually owns and controls the facility — individuals, companies, and their stakes. more

Nursing homes are often owned through layers: an operating company, a property company, management companies, and individual investors with percentage stakes. CMS publishes who holds 5%-or-greater interests and who has operational control. Ownership matters because it sets the budget: research has linked some ownership structures, especially certain chains and investment vehicles, to lower staffing. That's a pattern across the industry, not a verdict on any one building.

What to do with this: know who owns the home before you sign anything, and ask the administrator who actually sets the staffing budget.

CMS lists no chain affiliation for this facility.

Owner / managerRoleStakeSince
Baptist Village Retirement Communities of Oklahoma, Inc (Organization)5% or greater direct ownership interest100%09/26/1993
Abbott, Paul (Individual)Adp of the snfNOT APPLICABLE11/18/2025
Baptist Village Retirement Communities of Oklahoma, Inc (Organization)Adp of the snfNOT APPLICABLE09/26/1993
Barrett, Jean (Individual)Adp of the snfNOT APPLICABLE11/28/2023
Bell, Kevin (Individual)Adp of the snfNOT APPLICABLE11/17/2020
Briggs, Parniece (Individual)Adp of the snfNOT APPLICABLE11/18/2025
Burrows, Doug (Individual)Adp of the snfNOT APPLICABLE11/18/2025
Davis, Frank (Individual)Adp of the snfNOT APPLICABLE11/29/2022
Enlow, Linda (Individual)Adp of the snfNOT APPLICABLE11/28/2023
Epperson, Mitzi (Individual)Adp of the snfNOT APPLICABLE07/07/2008
Fisher, Todd (Individual)Adp of the snfNOT APPLICABLE11/30/2021
Fluke, Lauri (Individual)Adp of the snfNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2013
Fuchs, Kellye (Individual)Adp of the snfNOT APPLICABLE11/28/2023
Gandy, Mark (Individual)Adp of the snfNOT APPLICABLE11/30/2021
Gibbs, George (Individual)Adp of the snfNOT APPLICABLE11/19/2024
Gibbs, Linda (Individual)Adp of the snfNOT APPLICABLE11/30/2021
Goddard, Catherine (Individual)Adp of the snfNOT APPLICABLE11/19/2024
Haynes, Nan (Individual)Adp of the snfNOT APPLICABLE11/18/2025
Johnson, Michael (Individual)Adp of the snfNOT APPLICABLE11/19/2024
Johnson, Will (Individual)Adp of the snfNOT APPLICABLE11/17/2020
Koons, Brian (Individual)Adp of the snfNOT APPLICABLE11/18/2025
Lewis, Brian (Individual)Adp of the snfNOT APPLICABLE04/14/2012
Matlock, Michael (Individual)Adp of the snfNOT APPLICABLE11/19/2019
Mcfarland, Randall (Individual)Adp of the snfNOT APPLICABLE11/28/2023
Mcpherson, Andy (Individual)Adp of the snfNOT APPLICABLE11/18/2025
Miles, Judy (Individual)Adp of the snfNOT APPLICABLE11/28/2023
Miller, Eddie (Individual)Adp of the snfNOT APPLICABLE11/19/2024
Mink, Jacqueline (Individual)Adp of the snfNOT APPLICABLE11/30/2021
Pierce, William (Individual)Adp of the snfNOT APPLICABLE10/01/1993
Rooker, Susan (Individual)Adp of the snfNOT APPLICABLE11/19/2019
Russell, Kerry (Individual)Adp of the snfNOT APPLICABLE11/19/2024
Scott, Paul (Individual)Adp of the snfNOT APPLICABLE11/29/2022
Short, Wendell (Individual)Adp of the snfNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2013
Smith, Margaret (Individual)Adp of the snfNOT APPLICABLE11/19/2024
Staats, Samuel (Individual)Adp of the snfNOT APPLICABLE11/19/2024
Stewart, Frieda (Individual)Adp of the snfNOT APPLICABLE08/20/2019
Thomas, Steven (Individual)Adp of the snfNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2003
Trentham, Matthew (Individual)Adp of the snfNOT APPLICABLE11/28/2023
Turner, James (Individual)Adp of the snfNOT APPLICABLE11/28/2023
Walkingstick, Steven (Individual)Adp of the snfNOT APPLICABLE07/15/2021
Abbott, Paul (Individual)Corporate directorNOT APPLICABLE11/18/2025
Barrett, Jean (Individual)Corporate directorNOT APPLICABLE11/28/2023
Bell, Kevin (Individual)Corporate directorNOT APPLICABLE11/17/2020
Briggs, Parniece (Individual)Corporate directorNOT APPLICABLE11/18/2025
Burrows, Doug (Individual)Corporate directorNOT APPLICABLE11/18/2025
Davis, Frank (Individual)Corporate directorNOT APPLICABLE11/29/2022
Enlow, Linda (Individual)Corporate directorNOT APPLICABLE11/28/2023
Fisher, Todd (Individual)Corporate directorNOT APPLICABLE11/30/2021
Fuchs, Kellye (Individual)Corporate directorNOT APPLICABLE11/28/2023
Gandy, Mark (Individual)Corporate directorNOT APPLICABLE11/30/2021
Gibbs, George (Individual)Corporate directorNOT APPLICABLE11/19/2024
Gibbs, Linda (Individual)Corporate directorNOT APPLICABLE11/30/2021
Goddard, Catherine (Individual)Corporate directorNOT APPLICABLE11/19/2024
Haynes, Nan (Individual)Corporate directorNOT APPLICABLE11/18/2025
Johnson, Michael (Individual)Corporate directorNOT APPLICABLE11/19/2024
Johnson, Will (Individual)Corporate directorNOT APPLICABLE11/17/2020
Koons, Brian (Individual)Corporate directorNOT APPLICABLE11/18/2025
Matlock, Michael (Individual)Corporate directorNOT APPLICABLE11/19/2019
Mcfarland, Randall (Individual)Corporate directorNOT APPLICABLE11/28/2023
Mcpherson, Andy (Individual)Corporate directorNOT APPLICABLE11/18/2025
Miles, Judy (Individual)Corporate directorNOT APPLICABLE11/28/2023
Miller, Eddie (Individual)Corporate directorNOT APPLICABLE11/19/2024
Mink, Jacqueline (Individual)Corporate directorNOT APPLICABLE11/30/2021
Russell, Kerry (Individual)Corporate directorNOT APPLICABLE11/19/2024
Scott, Paul (Individual)Corporate directorNOT APPLICABLE11/29/2022
Smith, Margaret (Individual)Corporate directorNOT APPLICABLE11/19/2024
Staats, Samuel (Individual)Corporate directorNOT APPLICABLE11/19/2024
Trentham, Matthew (Individual)Corporate directorNOT APPLICABLE11/28/2023
Turner, James (Individual)Corporate directorNOT APPLICABLE11/28/2023
Fluke, Lauri (Individual)Corporate officerNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2021
Gandy, Mark (Individual)Corporate officerNOT APPLICABLE11/19/2024
Mcfarland, Randall (Individual)Corporate officerNOT APPLICABLE11/19/2024
Pierce, William (Individual)Corporate officerNOT APPLICABLE10/01/1993
Rooker, Susan (Individual)Corporate officerNOT APPLICABLE11/19/2019
Russell, Mary (Individual)Corporate officerNOT APPLICABLE11/19/2019
Short, Wendell (Individual)Corporate officerNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2013
Stewart, Frieda (Individual)Corporate officerNOT APPLICABLE08/20/2019
Thomas, Steven (Individual)Corporate officerNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2003
Trentham, Matthew (Individual)Corporate officerNOT APPLICABLE11/19/2024
Baptist Village Retirement Communities of Oklahoma, Inc (Organization)Operational/managerial controlNOT APPLICABLE09/26/1993
Epperson, Mitzi (Individual)Operational/managerial controlNOT APPLICABLE07/07/2008
Fluke, Lauri (Individual)Operational/managerial controlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2021
Pierce, William (Individual)Operational/managerial controlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/1993
Rooker, Susan (Individual)Operational/managerial controlNOT APPLICABLE11/19/2019
Short, Wendell (Individual)Operational/managerial controlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2013
Stewart, Frieda (Individual)Operational/managerial controlNOT APPLICABLE08/20/2019
Thomas, Steven (Individual)Operational/managerial controlNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2003
Walkingstick, Steven (Individual)Operational/managerial controlNOT APPLICABLE07/15/2021

Nearby facilities in Tulsa County

Most families compare 2–3 homes. Same county, sorted by overall rating:

The Villages at Southern Hills★★★★★Tulsa
Trinity Woods, Inc.★★★★★Tulsa
Zarrow Pointe★★★★★Tulsa
Broken Arrow Nursing Home, Inc★★★★Broken Arrow

All nursing homes in Tulsa County

Visiting? Go in with questions.

Built from this facility’s own CMS data — bring them on the tour.

  • Their reported RN hours (0.16/resident/day) are below the OK median (0.32) — ask how nights and weekends are staffed.
  • Their total nursing staff turnover (70.5%) is above the OK median (56.8%) — ask how long the aides on your person's unit have worked there.
  • CMS data shows 2 fines totaling $18,155 in its current data window — ask what the citations were for and what changed afterward.
  • Their weekend total nurse staffing (3.66/resident/day) is lower than their overall figure (3.95) — ask who covers weekends and how shifts are filled when someone calls out.
  • Their last standard health inspection was June 27, 2025 — ask what's improved since then.
  • CMS records that this facility has a resident council — ask to speak with a council member before deciding.
  • They have 120 certified beds and serve an average of 75 residents per day — ask which unit your person would be on and who staffs it overnight.

Data: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (data.cms.gov), processing date June 1, 2026. This site is not affiliated with CMS or any government agency.