Find That Nursing Home

Heritage Pointe of Huntington

1180 West 500 North, Huntington, IN 46750Map

(260) 355-2750

Medicare/Medicaid certified78 certified beds~73 residents/dayNon profit - Corporation

CMS abuse icon — this facility was cited for abuse
What the abuse icon means more

CMS flags a facility with its abuse icon when inspectors cited it for abuse that harmed a resident within the past year, or for abuse that could have harmed a resident in each of the last two years. CMS shows this same icon on its own Care Compare site, and caps the facility's ratings while it's flagged. The icon is removed when newer inspections come back clean. The deficiency list below will contain the underlying citations — read them.

What to do with this: read the abuse-related citations below, and ask the facility directly what happened and what changed. Verify the current status at medicare.gov/care-compare.

Last standard health inspection: February 11, 2026

Heritage Pointe of Huntington is a 78-bed nonprofit, corporation-run nursing home in Huntington, Huntington County, Indiana, serving an average of 73 residents per day. As of CMS data processed June 1, 2026, its overall rating is 3 of 5 stars.

CMS star ratings

CMS scores every nursing home 1–5 stars overall, built from three sub-ratings. more

Medicare inspects and measures every certified nursing home, then rolls the results into a 1–5 star overall rating. It combines three parts: health inspections, staffing, and quality measures. Five stars means much better than average — it does not mean perfect. One star means much worse than average — it does not mean every shift is bad. Stars are a screening tool, not a verdict. They can lag reality by months, and they can't see things like how kind the aides are or how the building smells at 7am.

What to do with this: use stars to build a shortlist, then visit in person. Nothing on this site replaces walking the halls.

Overall
IN median: 3★
Health inspectionsmost objective — on-site surveyors
IN median: 3★
Staffingpayroll-audited
IN median: 2★
Quality measurespartly self-reported by the facility
IN median: 5★
Health-inspection stars are graded on a curve within each state — never compare stars across state lines. more

CMS sets health-inspection star cutoffs separately for each state: roughly the top 10% of homes in a state get 5 stars, the bottom 20% get 1 star, no matter how the state compares to others. That means a 4-star home in one state and a 4-star home in another state may have very different inspection records. The stars tell you how a home compares to its neighbors, not to the whole country. That's why this site shows your state's median next to each star rating — and never a national star comparison.

What to do with this: compare stars only between homes in the same state. To compare across states, use staffing hours — those are real numbers, not curves.

Not all three sub-ratings are equally hard to game: inspections are the most objective, quality measures the least. more

The three sub-ratings come from different sources. Health inspections are done on-site by trained state surveyors who show up mostly unannounced — the most objective signal. Staffing comes from payroll records that facilities must submit and CMS audits — quite reliable. Quality measures are partly self-reported by the facility from its own resident assessments — useful, but the facility grades some of its own homework.

What to do with this: when sub-ratings disagree, weigh the inspection star most and the quality-measure star least.

Staffing

Reported hours per resident per day, from payroll records. Hours, unlike stars, can be compared across states.

Hours per resident per day: total staff hours worked, divided by the number of residents. more

If a home reports 3.5 total nursing hours per resident per day, that's all nursing staff time across 24 hours — roughly one caregiver-hour every 7 hours per resident, spread across day, evening, and night shifts. On a real floor it decides whether call lights get answered in 5 minutes or 25, whether someone has time to help with dinner, and whether night shift is one aide for a hall or two. Unlike star ratings, hours are actual numbers, so they CAN be compared across state lines.

What to do with this: compare a home's hours to the state and national medians shown, and ask the facility how the hours split across day, evening, and night shifts.

RN (registered nurse) hours

This facility0.42
IN median0.59
US median0.58

LPN (licensed practical nurse) hours

This facility0.89
IN median0.77
US median0.85

Nurse aide hours

This facility2.93
IN median2.17
US median2.23

Total nursing hours

This facility4.23
IN median3.55
US median3.69

CMS also adjusts these numbers for how sick each home’s residents are — a home with sicker residents needs more staff for the same star. This home’s case-mix-adjusted total: 4.59 (US median, adjusted: 3.78).

CMS also adjusts staffing numbers for how sick each home's residents are. more

A home full of short-term rehab patients needs different staffing than a home caring for people with advanced dementia or ventilators. Case-mix adjustment estimates how many hours a home's particular residents need, then scales the reported hours so homes can be compared fairly. A home with sicker residents needs more staff for the same star. This page shows reported (raw payroll) numbers and compares them only to other reported numbers — like with like.

What to do with this: if a home's reported hours look low, check whether its residents may simply need less care — and ask the facility directly.

Staff turnover

Total nursing staff turnover: 41.9% · IN median: 45.9% · RN turnover: 50% (IN median: 40%)

The share of nursing staff who left within the year. Lower is steadier. more

Total nursing staff turnover is the percentage of the home's nurses and aides who stopped working there during the year. Around half of nursing-home staff leaving annually is sadly common in this industry. High turnover means residents are cared for by people who don't know them — which matters enormously for dementia care, pain management, and noticing the small changes that catch problems early. Low turnover usually means staff are treated well enough to stay.

What to do with this: when you visit, ask aides how long they've worked there. Long-tenured aides are the best sign a building has.

Inspections & deficiencies

The last 3 inspection cycles, from CMS’s federal health-survey file. State-only citations and fire-safety surveys are not included — an empty list means nothing federal is in this file, not that nothing ever happened.

Each deficiency gets a letter A–L: how severe it was × how widespread it was. more

Surveyors grade every deficiency on a grid. Severity runs from 'potential for minimal harm' up to 'immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.' Scope runs from isolated (one or a few residents) to pattern to widespread. A and B are paperwork-level; D–F caused no actual harm but had the potential; G–I caused actual harm; J, K, and L mean immediate jeopardy — the most serious finding a surveyor can make. Most citations nationally are D–E.

What to do with this: scan for G or higher. One J/K/L tells you more than ten D's.

Standard surveys are routine; complaint surveys happen because someone reported a problem. more

A standard survey is the routine top-to-bottom inspection every home gets on a recurring cycle. A complaint survey happens because a resident, family member, or staff member reported something to the state — surveyors come specifically to investigate it. Infection-control surveys focus on practices like hand hygiene and isolation procedures. A deficiency found during a complaint survey means someone cared enough to report it and a surveyor confirmed enough to cite it.

What to do with this: note which deficiencies came from complaints — they show you what residents and families actually experienced.

The F-number on each deficiency is CMS's code for which federal requirement was violated. more

Every federal nursing-home requirement has a tag number. F0686, for example, is the pressure-ulcer requirement; F0600 is freedom from abuse. The tag tells you exactly which rule was broken, and the description next to it is CMS's own plain-language summary of that rule. The same tag appearing across multiple inspections is a pattern worth noticing.

What to do with this: if the same tag repeats across surveys, ask the facility what changed since the last citation.

This data shows federal health surveys only — state-only citations and fire-safety surveys aren't included. more

CMS's public deficiency file contains federal health-survey citations. It does not include citations issued under state-only rules, fire-safety (Life Safety Code) surveys, or anything older than three inspection cycles. A facility with no rows here may still have state citations or fire-safety findings. 'No deficiencies in this file' never means 'no violations ever.'

What to do with this: for the full picture, check your state health department's site and medicare.gov/care-compare, which shows fire-safety results separately.

16 deficiencies across the last 3 inspection cycles, in CMS’s federal health-survey file:

  • Quality of Life and Care: 6
  • Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation: 2
  • Resident Rights: 2
  • Infection Control: 2
  • Pharmacy Service: 2
  • Resident Assessment and Care Planning: 1
  • Nutrition and Dietary: 1
  • March 10, 2026Complaint surveyTag F0600Gactual harm, isolated

    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

    Deficient, Provider has date of correction · corrected March 23, 2026

  • February 11, 2026Standard surveyTag F0580Dno actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

    Deficient, Provider has date of correction · corrected March 23, 2026

  • February 11, 2026Standard surveyTag F0609Dno actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

    Deficient, Provider has date of correction · corrected March 23, 2026

  • February 11, 2026Standard surveyTag F0655Dno actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted

    Deficient, Provider has date of correction · corrected March 23, 2026

  • February 11, 2026Standard surveyTag F0689Dno actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

    Deficient, Provider has date of correction · corrected March 23, 2026

  • February 11, 2026Standard surveyTag F0806Dno actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.

    Deficient, Provider has date of correction · corrected March 23, 2026

  • February 11, 2026Standard surveyTag F0882Dno actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.

    Deficient, Provider has date of correction · corrected March 23, 2026

  • October 20, 2025Complaint surveyTag F0689Dno actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

    Deficient, Provider has date of correction · corrected December 19, 2025

  • January 3, 2025Standard surveyTag F0677Dno actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.

    Deficient, Provider has date of correction · corrected January 31, 2025

  • January 3, 2025Standard surveyTag F0689Dno actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

    Deficient, Provider has date of correction · corrected January 31, 2025

Show 6 more deficiencies
  • January 3, 2025Standard surveyTag F0758Dno actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.

    Deficient, Provider has date of correction · corrected January 31, 2025

  • January 3, 2025Standard surveyTag F0761Dno actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.

    Deficient, Provider has date of correction · corrected January 31, 2025

  • January 3, 2025Standard surveyTag F0880Eno actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

    Deficient, Provider has date of correction · corrected January 31, 2025

  • April 23, 2024Complaint surveyTag F0684Dno actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

    Deficient, Provider has date of correction · corrected May 17, 2024

  • February 26, 2024Standard surveyTag F0578Dno actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.

    Deficient, Provider has date of correction · corrected March 18, 2024

  • February 26, 2024Standard surveyTag F0684Dno actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

    Deficient, Provider has date of correction · corrected March 18, 2024

Fines & penalties

CMS can fine a home or stop paying for new admissions. Shown per CMS's current data window (~3 years) — not all-time. more

When deficiencies are serious or aren't fixed, CMS can impose a fine (a civil money penalty) or a payment denial — refusing to pay for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions until the home fixes the problem. Payment denials hit harder than most fines because they stop revenue. CMS's public dataset covers a rolling window of roughly the last three years, so the totals here are recent history, not an all-time record. Many facilities have no penalties in the window — that's common, not remarkable.

What to do with this: a recent large fine deserves a direct question on your visit — what happened, and what changed?

No federal penalties in CMS’s current data window — many facilities have none; this is common.

Ownership & chain

Who actually owns and controls the facility — individuals, companies, and their stakes. more

Nursing homes are often owned through layers: an operating company, a property company, management companies, and individual investors with percentage stakes. CMS publishes who holds 5%-or-greater interests and who has operational control. Ownership matters because it sets the budget: research has linked some ownership structures, especially certain chains and investment vehicles, to lower staffing. That's a pattern across the industry, not a verdict on any one building.

What to do with this: know who owns the home before you sign anything, and ask the administrator who actually sets the staffing budget.

CMS lists no chain affiliation for this facility.

Owner / managerRoleStakeSince
Blue Management Services LLC (Organization)Adp of the snfNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Boxell, Jeffery (Individual)Adp of the snfNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Evergreen Services Group Topco LLC (Organization)Adp of the snfNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
First Bank of Berne (Organization)Adp of the snfNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2022
Forvis Mazars, LLP (Organization)Adp of the snfNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Mathew, Pekkakuzhiyil (Individual)Adp of the snfNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2022
Morrison Management Specialists Inc (Organization)Adp of the snfNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Proactive Medical Review and Consultants LLC (Organization)Adp of the snfNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Rice, Edwin (Individual)Adp of the snfNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Skylight Partners Inc (Organization)Adp of the snfNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Stanley, Jodie (Individual)Adp of the snfNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2022
United Methodist Memorial Home (Organization)Adp of the snfNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2022
Smith, Scott (Individual)Corporate officerNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2022
Sprunger, Kyle (Individual)Corporate officerNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2022
Wheeler, Dane (Individual)Corporate officerNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2022
Borne-Bauman, Candice (Individual)Managing control - governing bodyNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2022
Flueckiger, Russell (Individual)Managing control - governing bodyNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2022
Lehman, Scott (Individual)Managing control - governing bodyNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2022
Macklin, Larry (Individual)Managing control - governing bodyNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2022
Mcintire, David (Individual)Managing control - governing bodyNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2022
Adams County Memorial Hospital (Organization)Operational/managerial controlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2022
Borne-Bauman, Candice (Individual)Operational/managerial controlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2022
Boxell, Jeffery (Individual)Operational/managerial controlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Brothers, Alfred (Individual)Operational/managerial controlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Carmer, Toni (Individual)Operational/managerial controlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Conner, Steven (Individual)Operational/managerial controlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Fenstermacher, Marlene (Individual)Operational/managerial controlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Flueckiger, Russell (Individual)Operational/managerial controlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2022
Forvis Mazars, LLP (Organization)Operational/managerial controlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Fullbright, Shelly (Individual)Operational/managerial controlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Healthcare Therapy Services Inc (Organization)Operational/managerial controlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Hoy, Marcelline (Individual)Operational/managerial controlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Jones, Jeffery (Individual)Operational/managerial controlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Knepp, Glenn (Individual)Operational/managerial controlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Lehman, Scott (Individual)Operational/managerial controlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2022
Macklin, Larry (Individual)Operational/managerial controlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2022
Mathew, Pekkakuzhiyil (Individual)Operational/managerial controlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2022
Mcintire, David (Individual)Operational/managerial controlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2022
Morrison Management Specialists Inc (Organization)Operational/managerial controlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Proactive Medical Review and Consultants LLC (Organization)Operational/managerial controlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Ream, Thomas (Individual)Operational/managerial controlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Rice, Edwin (Individual)Operational/managerial controlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Smith, Scott (Individual)Operational/managerial controlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2022
Sprunger, Kyle (Individual)Operational/managerial controlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2022
Stanley, Jodie (Individual)Operational/managerial controlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2022
United Methodist Memorial Home (Organization)Operational/managerial controlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2022
Wheeler, Dane (Individual)Operational/managerial controlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2022

Nearby facilities in Huntington County

Most families compare 2–3 homes. Same county, sorted by overall rating:

Hickory Creek at Huntington★★★★★Huntington
Heritage Pointe of Warren★★★★Warren
Envive of Huntington★★★★★Huntington

All nursing homes in Huntington County

Visiting? Go in with questions.

Built from this facility’s own CMS data — bring them on the tour.

  • CMS has applied its abuse icon to this facility — ask what happened, what the corrective plan was, and how staff are trained now.
  • Their reported RN hours (0.42/resident/day) are below the IN median (0.59) — ask how nights and weekends are staffed.
  • Their weekend total nurse staffing (3.96/resident/day) is lower than their overall figure (4.23) — ask who covers weekends and how shifts are filled when someone calls out.
  • Their last standard health inspection was February 11, 2026 — ask what's improved since then.
  • CMS records that this facility has a resident council — ask to speak with a council member before deciding.
  • They have 78 certified beds and serve an average of 73 residents per day — ask which unit your person would be on and who staffs it overnight.
  • They report 4.23 total nursing hours per resident per day (IN median: 3.55) — ask how those hours split across day, evening, and night shifts.

Data: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (data.cms.gov), processing date June 1, 2026. This site is not affiliated with CMS or any government agency.