Find That Nursing Home

Atrium Health Navicent Baldwin

821 North Cobb Street, Milledgeville, GA 31061Map

(478) 454-3649

Medicare/Medicaid certified15 certified beds~10 residents/dayNon profit - Other

Last standard health inspection: December 8, 2024

Atrium Health Navicent Baldwin is a 15-bed nonprofit nursing home in Milledgeville, Baldwin County, Georgia, serving an average of 10 residents per day. As of CMS data processed June 1, 2026, its overall rating is 5 of 5 stars.

CMS star ratings

CMS scores every nursing home 1–5 stars overall, built from three sub-ratings. more

Medicare inspects and measures every certified nursing home, then rolls the results into a 1–5 star overall rating. It combines three parts: health inspections, staffing, and quality measures. Five stars means much better than average — it does not mean perfect. One star means much worse than average — it does not mean every shift is bad. Stars are a screening tool, not a verdict. They can lag reality by months, and they can't see things like how kind the aides are or how the building smells at 7am.

What to do with this: use stars to build a shortlist, then visit in person. Nothing on this site replaces walking the halls.

Overall
GA median: 3★
Health inspectionsmost objective — on-site surveyors
GA median: 3★
Staffingpayroll-audited
GA median: 2★
Quality measurespartly self-reported by the facility
GA median: 3★
Health-inspection stars are graded on a curve within each state — never compare stars across state lines. more

CMS sets health-inspection star cutoffs separately for each state: roughly the top 10% of homes in a state get 5 stars, the bottom 20% get 1 star, no matter how the state compares to others. That means a 4-star home in one state and a 4-star home in another state may have very different inspection records. The stars tell you how a home compares to its neighbors, not to the whole country. That's why this site shows your state's median next to each star rating — and never a national star comparison.

What to do with this: compare stars only between homes in the same state. To compare across states, use staffing hours — those are real numbers, not curves.

Not all three sub-ratings are equally hard to game: inspections are the most objective, quality measures the least. more

The three sub-ratings come from different sources. Health inspections are done on-site by trained state surveyors who show up mostly unannounced — the most objective signal. Staffing comes from payroll records that facilities must submit and CMS audits — quite reliable. Quality measures are partly self-reported by the facility from its own resident assessments — useful, but the facility grades some of its own homework.

What to do with this: when sub-ratings disagree, weigh the inspection star most and the quality-measure star least.

Staffing

Reported hours per resident per day, from payroll records. Hours, unlike stars, can be compared across states.

Hours per resident per day: total staff hours worked, divided by the number of residents. more

If a home reports 3.5 total nursing hours per resident per day, that's all nursing staff time across 24 hours — roughly one caregiver-hour every 7 hours per resident, spread across day, evening, and night shifts. On a real floor it decides whether call lights get answered in 5 minutes or 25, whether someone has time to help with dinner, and whether night shift is one aide for a hall or two. Unlike star ratings, hours are actual numbers, so they CAN be compared across state lines.

What to do with this: compare a home's hours to the state and national medians shown, and ask the facility how the hours split across day, evening, and night shifts.

RN (registered nurse) hours

This facility2.95
GA median0.44
US median0.58

LPN (licensed practical nurse) hours

This facility0.06
GA median0.91
US median0.85

Nurse aide hours

This facility1.82
GA median2.09
US median2.23

Total nursing hours

This facility4.84
GA median3.44
US median3.69

CMS also adjusts these numbers for how sick each home’s residents are — a home with sicker residents needs more staff for the same star. This home’s case-mix-adjusted total: 4.90 (US median, adjusted: 3.78).

CMS also adjusts staffing numbers for how sick each home's residents are. more

A home full of short-term rehab patients needs different staffing than a home caring for people with advanced dementia or ventilators. Case-mix adjustment estimates how many hours a home's particular residents need, then scales the reported hours so homes can be compared fairly. A home with sicker residents needs more staff for the same star. This page shows reported (raw payroll) numbers and compares them only to other reported numbers — like with like.

What to do with this: if a home's reported hours look low, check whether its residents may simply need less care — and ask the facility directly.

Staff turnover

Turnover: The facility's staffing data was missing or invalid for calculating turnover, so this measure receives the minimum staffing points.

The share of nursing staff who left within the year. Lower is steadier. more

Total nursing staff turnover is the percentage of the home's nurses and aides who stopped working there during the year. Around half of nursing-home staff leaving annually is sadly common in this industry. High turnover means residents are cared for by people who don't know them — which matters enormously for dementia care, pain management, and noticing the small changes that catch problems early. Low turnover usually means staff are treated well enough to stay.

What to do with this: when you visit, ask aides how long they've worked there. Long-tenured aides are the best sign a building has.

Inspections & deficiencies

The last 3 inspection cycles, from CMS’s federal health-survey file. State-only citations and fire-safety surveys are not included — an empty list means nothing federal is in this file, not that nothing ever happened.

Each deficiency gets a letter A–L: how severe it was × how widespread it was. more

Surveyors grade every deficiency on a grid. Severity runs from 'potential for minimal harm' up to 'immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.' Scope runs from isolated (one or a few residents) to pattern to widespread. A and B are paperwork-level; D–F caused no actual harm but had the potential; G–I caused actual harm; J, K, and L mean immediate jeopardy — the most serious finding a surveyor can make. Most citations nationally are D–E.

What to do with this: scan for G or higher. One J/K/L tells you more than ten D's.

Standard surveys are routine; complaint surveys happen because someone reported a problem. more

A standard survey is the routine top-to-bottom inspection every home gets on a recurring cycle. A complaint survey happens because a resident, family member, or staff member reported something to the state — surveyors come specifically to investigate it. Infection-control surveys focus on practices like hand hygiene and isolation procedures. A deficiency found during a complaint survey means someone cared enough to report it and a surveyor confirmed enough to cite it.

What to do with this: note which deficiencies came from complaints — they show you what residents and families actually experienced.

The F-number on each deficiency is CMS's code for which federal requirement was violated. more

Every federal nursing-home requirement has a tag number. F0686, for example, is the pressure-ulcer requirement; F0600 is freedom from abuse. The tag tells you exactly which rule was broken, and the description next to it is CMS's own plain-language summary of that rule. The same tag appearing across multiple inspections is a pattern worth noticing.

What to do with this: if the same tag repeats across surveys, ask the facility what changed since the last citation.

This data shows federal health surveys only — state-only citations and fire-safety surveys aren't included. more

CMS's public deficiency file contains federal health-survey citations. It does not include citations issued under state-only rules, fire-safety (Life Safety Code) surveys, or anything older than three inspection cycles. A facility with no rows here may still have state citations or fire-safety findings. 'No deficiencies in this file' never means 'no violations ever.'

What to do with this: for the full picture, check your state health department's site and medicare.gov/care-compare, which shows fire-safety results separately.

No federal health-survey deficiencies in this file. (State-only citations and fire-safety surveys are not included in CMS’s public deficiency file.)

Fines & penalties

CMS can fine a home or stop paying for new admissions. Shown per CMS's current data window (~3 years) — not all-time. more

When deficiencies are serious or aren't fixed, CMS can impose a fine (a civil money penalty) or a payment denial — refusing to pay for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions until the home fixes the problem. Payment denials hit harder than most fines because they stop revenue. CMS's public dataset covers a rolling window of roughly the last three years, so the totals here are recent history, not an all-time record. Many facilities have no penalties in the window — that's common, not remarkable.

What to do with this: a recent large fine deserves a direct question on your visit — what happened, and what changed?

Fines: 2 totaling $13,520 — per CMS data (rolling ~3-year window).

DateTypeAmount / length
December 8, 2025Fine$6,760
December 8, 2025Fine$6,760

Ownership & chain

Who actually owns and controls the facility — individuals, companies, and their stakes. more

Nursing homes are often owned through layers: an operating company, a property company, management companies, and individual investors with percentage stakes. CMS publishes who holds 5%-or-greater interests and who has operational control. Ownership matters because it sets the budget: research has linked some ownership structures, especially certain chains and investment vehicles, to lower staffing. That's a pattern across the industry, not a verdict on any one building.

What to do with this: know who owns the home before you sign anything, and ask the administrator who actually sets the staffing budget.

CMS lists no chain affiliation for this facility.

Owner / managerRoleStakeSince
Navicent Health Inc (Organization)5% or greater direct ownership interest100%07/03/2021
Ah Georgia Inc (Organization)5% or greater indirect ownership interestNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED01/01/2019
The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority (Organization)5% or greater indirect ownership interestNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED01/01/2019
Advocate Health Inc (Organization)Adp of the snfNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2025
Atrium Health Inc (Organization)Adp of the snfNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2025
Filimon, Dragos (Individual)Adp of the snfNOT APPLICABLE01/16/2024
Navicent Health Inc (Organization)Adp of the snfNOT APPLICABLE04/21/2025
Ransom, Meredith (Individual)Adp of the snfNOT APPLICABLE01/16/2024
Austin, Derick (Individual)Corporate directorNOT APPLICABLE08/22/2025
Coleman, Lucretia (Individual)Corporate officerNOT APPLICABLE02/22/2018
Snyder, Erin (Individual)Corporate officerNOT APPLICABLE10/18/2023
Thomas, Mollie (Individual)Corporate officerNOT APPLICABLE01/16/2018
Wheeler, Philip (Individual)Corporate officerNOT APPLICABLE07/29/2025
Boddie, Patrice (Individual)Managing control - governing bodyNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2020
Coleman, Lucretia (Individual)Managing control - governing bodyNOT APPLICABLE02/22/2018
Harrison, Janet (Individual)Managing control - governing bodyNOT APPLICABLE02/22/2018
Pursley, John (Individual)Managing control - governing bodyNOT APPLICABLE09/07/2023
Shinholster, Lisa (Individual)Managing control - governing bodyNOT APPLICABLE01/29/2019
Thomas, Mollie (Individual)Managing control - governing bodyNOT APPLICABLE01/16/2018
Torrance, Thomas (Individual)Managing control - governing bodyNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2020
Advocate Health Inc (Organization)Operational/managerial controlNOT APPLICABLE12/02/2022
Atrium Health Inc (Organization)Operational/managerial controlNOT APPLICABLE10/09/2020
Filimon, Dragos (Individual)Operational/managerial controlNOT APPLICABLE01/16/2024
Ransom, Meredith (Individual)Operational/managerial controlNOT APPLICABLE01/16/2024
Boddie, Patrice (Individual)Trustee of the snfNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2020
Harrison, Janet (Individual)Trustee of the snfNOT APPLICABLE02/22/2018
Navicent Health Inc (Organization)Trustee of the snfNOT APPLICABLE07/03/2021
Pursley, John (Individual)Trustee of the snfNOT APPLICABLE09/07/2023
Shinholster, Lisa (Individual)Trustee of the snfNOT APPLICABLE01/29/2019
Thomas, Mollie (Individual)Trustee of the snfNOT APPLICABLE01/16/2018
Torrance, Thomas (Individual)Trustee of the snfNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2020

Nearby facilities in Baldwin County

Most families compare 2–3 homes. Same county, sorted by overall rating:

Green Acres Health and Rehabilitation★★★★★Milledgeville
Chaplinwood Nursing Home★★★★★Milledgeville
Bostick Nursing Center★★★★Milledgeville

All nursing homes in Baldwin County

Visiting? Go in with questions.

Built from this facility’s own CMS data — bring them on the tour.

  • CMS data shows 2 fines totaling $13,520 in its current data window — ask what the citations were for and what changed afterward.
  • Their last standard health inspection was December 8, 2024 — ask what's improved since then.
  • CMS does not record an active resident or family council here — ask how residents and families raise concerns to management.
  • They have 15 certified beds and serve an average of 10 residents per day — ask which unit your person would be on and who staffs it overnight.
  • They report 4.84 total nursing hours per resident per day (GA median: 3.44) — ask how those hours split across day, evening, and night shifts.
  • CMS lists no chain affiliation for this facility — ask who owns the home and who sets the staffing budget.

Data: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (data.cms.gov), processing date June 1, 2026. This site is not affiliated with CMS or any government agency.